3 Powerful Types of eBooks You Can Write and Sell Online

A big part of knowing how to write and sell ebooks is understanding exactly what will turn a prospect into a hungry buyer.
As you may have already discovered in my "Ultimate Information Entrepreneur's Success Package", earning months and years of leveraged income from a few weeks writing has virtually NOTHING to do with your writing ability, but EVERYTHING to do with understanding how to identify and satisfy a raging hunger within markets.
When you think about how to write a sell ebooks, think about 1 of these 3 proven "types" of infoproducts that will turn your prospects into buyers...
1. Innovator. You have identified a tip, technique or strategy that will go one-step further (incremental innovation) or take a giant LEAP forward (radical innovation) than is currently available.
To understand how to write and sell ebooks as the "innovator", you have a very good grasp of both what the prospector is really looking for and what currently exists in your marketplace.
2. Collector. The value in this type of information product is to collect sources of information from a wide variety of sources and distill it down to the "best of" or a compilation of strategies aimed at satisfying a given market demand.
3. Investigator. Yet another method of how to write and sell ebooks, the investigator seeks to discover and prove the value of a given approach.
Discovery allows you to bring value by bringing to light little-known or "underground" secrets to solving specific problems
Proving the value of a given approach is also of high value in this age of skepticism and doubt. If you can provide case studies to support a given approach, you'll be bringing extra value to the market.
Now, each of these approaches has its advantages and disadvantages.
When most people think of how to write and sell ebooks, they think of being collectors, however adding an aspect of innovation is how you can really differentiate yourself in your market.
Innovation allows you to claim ownership to solving an urgent and pressing problem for your market. Out of owership will come branding, and out of branding can come tremendous financial advantages.
I have used all 3 approaches and advise everyone who is serious about becoming an information entrepreneur and wants to know how to write and sell ebooks to use each approach. take from http://www.getmyarticles.com/

Defining knowledge (philosophy)

We suppose ourselves to possess unqualified scientific knowledge of a thing, as opposed to knowing it in the accidental way in which the sophist knows, when we think that we know the cause on which the fact depends, as the cause of that fact and of no other, and, further, that the fact could not be other than it is. Now that scientific knowing is something of this sort is evident — witness both those who falsely claim it and those who actually possess it, since the former merely imagine themselves to be, while the latter are also actually, in the condition described. Consequently the proper object of unqualified scientific knowledge is something which cannot be other than it is.

— Aristotle, Posterior Analytics (Book 1 Part 2)

The definition of knowledge is a matter of on-going debate among philosophers in the field of epistemology. The classical definition, described but not ultimately endorsed by, Planto[1], has it that in order for there to be knowledge at least three criteria must be fulfilled; that in order to count as knowledge, a statement must be justified,true, and believed. Some claim that these conditions are not sufficient, as Gettier case examples allegedly demonstrate. There are a number of alternatives proposed, including Robert Nozick's arguments for a requirement that knowledge 'tracks the truth' and Simon Blackburn's additional requirement that we do not want to say that those who meet any of these conditions 'through a defect, flaw, or failure' have knowledge. Richard Kirkham suggests that our definition of knowledge requires that the believer's evidence is such that it logically necessitates the truth of the belief.[citation needed]
In contrast to this approach, Wittgenstein observed, following Moore's paradox, that one can say "He believes it, but it isn't so", but not "He knows it, but it isn't so". [2] He goes on to argue that these do not correspond to distinct mental states, but rather to distinct ways of talking about conviction. What is different here is not the mental state of the speaker, but the activity in which they are engaged. For example, on this account, to know that the kettle is boiling is not to be in a particular state of mind, but to perform a particular task with the statement that the kettle is boiling. Wittgenstein sought to bypass the difficulty of definition by looking to the way "knowledge" is used in natural languages. He saw knowledge as a case of a family resemblance.

-Knowledge - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

welcome

welcome to "Ali Ar-Ridha" the master of knowledge blogspot

at here you can get everything about knowledge